What do you mean? I always talk about "retrieving things" and "my vehicle". Grabbing things from "cars" (or "trucks" ) is for cucks, and I'm a macho alpha male™®.
Tja
joined 2 years ago
Of course they are winning, the American electorate made sure of that. Presidency, both chambers, Supreme Court, popular vote, etc.
Project 2025 was known worldwide, now they are just implementing it.
And the public seem to be fine with it, trump has one of the highest approval ratings in the world (despite being negative).
Obamacare will be next, then Medicare, then contraceptives, then gay marriage...
Mmmmm... Caldereta...
That website is quite full of FUD based on misunderstanding the license text and zero legal, court tested evidence. Nobody has asked anyone to provide the BIOS for your Dell computer. The FAQ at Elastic license page for instance, clears a lot of the misconceptions (falsehoods). Same with mongodbs. Same with redis.
SSPL is not AGPL and I never claimed it was, I said it's the next step GPL -> AGPL - > SSPL, with stronger and stonger copyleft protections. From distribution, to modified usage over a network, to unmodified usage, offering "as service".
If AWS wants to use my code for another yacht for bezos, they can either pay me or open the source for their code, just the same as I did. Contribute, fork the project or gtfo. And there are many forks of every SSPL project, so no problem there.
Every SSPL product I know is dual licensed, you can use either SSPL or some kind of enterprise license that allows you to do whatever you want, as long as you pay the required fees. Once you go enterprise the SSPL does not apply to you. See alibaba for instance, offering both elastic and mongodb as a service with no issue and no code made available.
Limiting the number of provider is exactly the point. You either pay the developers or make your code available.
I don't know about Elastic, but redis was accepting contributions so changing the license was very controversial, if not legally questionable. AFAIK mongodb, like sqlite, don't accept contributions.
Big lucrative deal? Just buy a license, like tens of thousands of others do, millions if we include other "code available" products that also offer licenses: red hat, Ubuntu, temporal, different Kafka versions, Postgres, MySQL, etc.
Don't
It's not mental illness, it's just an echo chamber. I also visit it from time to time to question if the content I consume suffers from the same problem.
Just stop being poor, duh!
Not really full oracle. The SSPL is the next step after GPL and AGPL, so basically anti-oracle. Anyone can use, distribute and provide SSPL software... as long as they publish their code as well. Seems fair to me...
Not really full oracle. The SSPL is the next step after GPL and AGPL, so basically anti-oracle. Anyone can use, distribute and provide SSPL software... as long as they publish their code as well. Seems fair to me.
You might have be doing something wrong then. MongoDB handles relationships just fine, just because your data has relations doesn't mean that it needs to be stored in tables. In fact, a graph database does relationships even better, but we don't use neo4j for all our apps, do we?
view more: next ›
What about... ism