this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
14 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

6316 readers
73 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

2 possible outcomes I foresee:

  • Move the headquarters overseas as at least then you only get hammered once.
  • Split manufacturing so that domestic product is produced locally and you build a second factory offshore to make goods for non-domestic customers.
[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I believe option 1 is not viable due to political risks and option 2 is irrelevant; the 15% isn't actually an export fee. It's just 15% cut of all revenues derived from sales to China.

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

It can be done in the next three year window quietly. Look at Ireland and the pharmaceutical/tech setup there were no corporate announcement for the tax optimization