this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
309 points (93.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

15761 readers
296 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Considering how many people don't know the basics in regards to driving law (e.g. under what circumstances you are allowed to use the horn, driving only so fast that you can stop before any danger that you can presently not see, parking rules, ...), I'd say 5 years is even too long of an interval, not too short of one.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The issue with it being less than 5 year IMO is that you would not have the capacity to test so many people so often.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Tbh, I don't really see that as an issue.

There's four potential parts to a license renewal:

  • medical check
  • theory test
  • driving test
  • submitting an up-to-date photo and printing the new license

In any civilized country, people have a yearly medical check (for health purposes) regardless, so you could just add the driver's license check to that.

Theory tests can be done on a PC, so you don't need a lot of humans to supervise. One should be enough for dozens of parallel tests just to make sure nobody is cheating.

The photo and printing part hardly takes any personell and can be outsourced super easily.

Leaves the actual driving test. In most countries the training required to become a driving examiner is really easy, often just a 1-3 month course. So it should be rather trivial to increase the capacity there. In my country there aren't even any full-time employees doing driving exams, they are all part-time, because the amount of required employees for that job is so low.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Agree to the first arguments but the last one not so much. We have fuckall capacity here and you can wait up to 3 months to even get a free date to take your driving test because there is so few people doing the grading.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

But still, that's a really easy thing to fix. People pay for their own exams, so if there's more demand, more people will get into this super easy to train job.