Comic Strips
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
Rules
-
😇 Be Nice!
- Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
-
🏘️ Community Standards
- Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
- Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
- Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
- Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
-
🧬 Keep it Real
- Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
-
📽️ Credit Where Credit is Due
- Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
- Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
-
📋 Post Formatting
- Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
- Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
- When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
✅ Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
-
📬 Post Frequency/SPAM
- Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 🖐) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 🖐) will be removed.
-
🏴☠️ Internationalization (i18n)
- Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
Sí, por favor [Spanish/Español]
- Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
-
🍿 Moderation
- We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
- When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists
The following artists are banned from the community.
- Jago
- Stonetoss
It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.
Web Accessibility
Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.
When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:
Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)
Web of Links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
view the rest of the comments
Damn dude. Bad faith arguments and ad hominem arguments are not conducive to productive discussion and will only serve to turn people off of your ideas.
You don't think we need a space program. Fine. I was just trying to express how it has and continues to benefit society. You meanwhile haven't really made any arguments to support your side, you just seem to be increasingly angry with me and space programs. I'm just left wondering why? Why die on this hill? Why do you think environmentalism supercedes science and awareness? You say it's a low tech dream, but earlier on you mentioned everyone still having a desktop and internet access, but where do you think those technologies come from?
There are far more harmful things humans do that you could rail against as angrily as you're coming at me about space, that would actually be productive to be rid of. Animal agriculture is by far the largest contributor to greenhouse gasses and it's not even close, but I haven't seen you mention it once in your pipe dream plan.
Animal AG vs space, climate-wise: animal agriculture dwarfs space programs by miles, with roughly 30% of all greenhouse gas emissions (≈16 Gt CO₂e/yr), thanks to methane, nitrous oxide, and deforestation/ land-use. Rocket launches are tiny in comparison, with less than 1% of greenhouse gas emissions, which are by the way many orders of magnitude below aviation.
Most in the field of environmental science (which I have an undergraduate degree in and many contact, but do not work in, just for transparency) agree that the priorities for reversing climate change in this century would be to first curb ruminant methane, stop deforestation, and cut food waste; all of which are achieved by placing limits on animal AG. Meanwhile, setting targeted rules to limit rocket soot/choose cleaner propellants are the most pressing issues in space travel, but again the impact isn't even close.
Anyway if you want to call me a stupid fuckhead and rant some more keep it to yourself. If you want to have an open conversation about how we can daydream a better society I'm all for it. I am however extremely tired of being told that the single greatest achievement of mankind (so far) is a pointless, harmful waste of money, especially by those who still support factory farming.
Me: My utopic pipe dream for a global downgrade of quality of life in society.
You: Space exploration is productive!
I still don't think you get the premise, and I don't care to keep explaining it to you. I just don't think you can grasp the basic concept here.
None the less to say; you're having a conversation with yourself about some other topic here now. Good luck talking to yourself about that. I was saying we need to pick a lower level of tech and stick to it. It's just a totally different topic to you.
Don't hit reply on this comment please. Please scroll up to your previous comment and reply to that instead. I think your topic is "How to have your cake and eat it too, space rockets edition". Good luck with your mass manufacturing projects.
Yes, we are having two different conversations. I’m talking data-driven ways to cut emissions; you’re pushing a downshift fantasy and lashing out at anyone who mentions trade-offs. I’m debating climate policy; you’re role-playing a civilization downgrade and calling names. I brought numbers; you brought insults, but policy runs on evidence, not ire.
Corporations and greedy whales are using up all our resources and you want to go after scientific exploration. The whole idea is completely insane, and you've proven to be its match. So, yeah, I'll bow out and you can celebrate your little victory while I go focus on changes that move the carbon math. And hey, if you catch someone glaring at you, don't worry, it's probably just your reflection.
Hello Chat GPT please tell me a good cupcake recipe.
I say that because you're back to thinking my pipe dream is actually a "climate policy debate" I swear you're illiterate.
Yeah... we discussed this already. Of course the whole world coming together for a vote to downshift was always a fantasy. You're proof that downshifting is impossible. Too many illiterate "smart people" like you who think it will involve an advanced rocketry program and massive amounts of technological "productivity"...
...you want the downshift that's not a downshift.
Still not getting it are you buddy. The world voting on a lower level of technology to adopt (aka a downshift) was always a fantasy. Yes.... Not sure why you keep bringing that up. We've discussed and agreed that at length now.
What fucking victory? The world coming together to decide only a lower tech was always a fantasy... It was never about holding a "climate policy debate" with you.
I guess I'll celebrate being right about the impossibility of global cooperation that produces a downshift. It's obviously an irrational dream.
Haha, cool... Have fun with that. I'll contact the world leaders when you're done. We'll print some voting forms together. Hahaha.
No, I Understand it's a fantasy. The problem is it's both inconsistent and counterproductive; preserving industry while kneecapping the sciences that generate mitigation tools won't cut emissions, it just blinds us to them.
Someone's fantasy is wrong on the Internet! You're a meme dude.
Also, running certain industries at a minimum level of progress and output whilst completely killing off others would definitely cut emissions.
Anyways your ears are firmly blocked and you're basically saying drastic cuts to Co2 won't cut emissions unless we're monitoring them from orbit.
It's totally stupid "I need a number" to know sciencism. Truly the kind of person who thinks trees don't make a sound when they fall unless there's someone listening with a Db monitor.
Meanwhile your recommendation requires an incredibly high amount of a technological base to what - launch 300 tonnes of Co2 emissions into the air per launch, when weather balloons, ground radar and weather station will suffice.
You're being ridiculous.