this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
66 points (98.5% liked)
Technology
425 readers
364 users here now
Share interesting Technology news and links.
Rules:
- No paywalled sites at all.
- News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
- No videos.
- Post only direct links.
To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:
- Al Jazeera;
- NBC;
- CNBC;
- Substack;
- Tom's Hardware;
- ZDNet;
- TechSpot;
- Ars Technica;
- Vox Media outlets, with exception for Axios;
- Engadget;
- TechCrunch;
- Gizmodo;
- Futurism;
- PCWorld;
- ComputerWorld;
- Mashable;
- Hackaday;
- WCCFTECH;
- Neowin.
More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.
Encouraged:
- Archive links in the body of the post.
- Linking to the direct source, instead of linking to an article talking about the source.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I know this will be unpopular, but I still don’t use a password manager.
Something about entrusting my passwords to a 3rd party’s software still feels wrong. I’d rather use a passphrase that’s generated per each service based on a set of rules.
You can self host Bitwarden, it's called Vaultwarden and it's open source
What about a purely local password manager like keepassxc? It's foss, you can compile it yourself and never connect to the internet. Or pass even, if you want something more minimal.
I like to use syncthing + keepass. Works really well
I like the idea of compiling locally. I need to look into this.
Thanks!
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with deterministically creating unique and strong pass phrases. It’s just hard to do it in a way that is hard to be both non-obvious (no url in the pass phrase) and also meet all the weird password requirements on the web. Fortunately, max password lengths have generally disappeared. Id love to be able to just use a Sha256 hash everywhere, but some sites require special characters, and some still ban them.
Not disagreeing, you just reminded me of the couple of sites I've signed up for that don't enforce max length on creation, but silently truncate passwords on login. Incredibly frustrating trying to figure out what an acceptable length is through multiple password recoveries.
Feels like putting all the eggs in one basket to me.
You’re not wrong, tbh. I do like the idea of having really complex and random passwords like I see can be generated from password managers.
That said, I would argue that putting all of your passwords (eggs) into one basket (a password manager) would also not be ideal.
Maybe if I used multiple password managers? If one got hacked, maybe the other would be secure?
Maybe if I added a salt to my passwords in a password manager, that would give me the best of both worlds? (I could store most of the password in the manager, then add the salt manually when I need to login. Though I couldn’t use auto-fill anymore.)
A local password manager (e.g. KeePass) will have all your passwords in an encrypted database saved on your machine. You can back up that file however you like. If somehow your machine gets hacked to the level where files can be accessed, the DB file is unusable without the password (the one password you'll need to remember).