this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8613 readers
222 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think there's legit a kernel of truth there. The tropes of "classical" fantasy have a lot of overlap with themes central to fascist ideology: bloodline as destiny, combat as the crucible of manhood, inherently evil races that can be killed without hesitation or remorse, romantic nostalgia for a "golden age," male-centric storytelling, fixation on kings and monarchs, individual "great men" as the drivers and movers of history, evil as a sinister occult force that has no goals beyond corrupting and inflicting suffering upon what is pure and good. There's nothing about fantasy as a genre that requires it to have these things, but they keep popping up because people uncritically copy what they already see or (less often) because the creators themselves are ideologically driven fascists.
Reactionaries look backwards. Fantasy is inherently a genre that looks backwards.
Communists look forwards. Science fiction is inherently a genre that looks forwards.
I'm not even remotely joking about this. Not all fantasy is fascist but a good deal of it includes fascist tropes. Meanwhile all science fiction that includes anything remotely fascist is plainly and obviously critical of it. There's no "haha future scifi empire with slavery is good actually" takes, because that would be stupid. The fantasy empires with slavery are uniquely capable of pretending to be good because they can hide behind "well duh it's a fantasy past setting, that stuff is just normal but these kingdoms are better than the evil alternatives surrounding them on all sides that they need to exterminate".
Let's not pretend there hasn't been plenty of reactionary sci-fi (Heinlein, Orwell, Rand, David Weber, John Ringo, Vox Day, John C. Wright to name a few).
I'd ask you to look into the World of Gor novels, but nobody deserves that.