this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
371 points (100.0% liked)

pics

28498 readers
1413 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Photo by Matthew Maran, 2018

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] DearMoogle@lemmy.today 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Hey - thanks for the info! Sucks if true. I took a closer look at both to compare and can see some differences, in the black splotches on the fox for example. Upon further search, Natural History Museum UK says he was shooting around North London. Could the same or similar fox art have been painted there? Idk!

[โ€“] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Its possible, like I said the signature may be behind that grass - but it is just too bad it is not credited regardless. If you were the photographer, you would think you would look for the signature/source of the art you are photographing to credit it.