this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2025
15 points (94.1% liked)
Technology
975 readers
139 users here now
Share interesting Technology news and links.
Rules:
- No paywalled sites at all.
- News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
- No external video links, only native(.mp4,...etc) links under 5 mins.
- Post only direct links.
To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:
- Al Jazeera;
- NBC;
- CNBC;
- Substack;
- Tom's Hardware;
- ZDNet;
- TechSpot;
- Ars Technica;
- Vox Media outlets(including Axios, due to new changes related to trackers on their website);
- Engadget;
- TechCrunch;
- Gizmodo;
- Futurism;
- PCWorld;
- ComputerWorld;
- Mashable;
- Hackaday;
- WCCFTECH;
- Neowin;
- Jacobin;
- Yahoo;
- Freethink;
- Big Think;
- Newsweek.
More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.
Encouraged:
- Archive links in the body of the post.
- Linking to the direct source, instead of linking to an article talking about the source.
Misc:
Relevant Lemmy Communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
none of this shit makes sense. "US paid nothing for these shares" vs US will make a 8.9 billi investment, and the remaining billions already given to them.
Also, he's gone so far right he's making the state own things, coming out the other side to communism (insert the correct left wing government term here)? the fuck?
Workers don't exactly own the US government to consider a stake in intel to be anything of the sort.
In a sense Intel has been 10% nationalized, which really doesn't mean much for the working class.
In a stateless society, the state owning anything would be impossible. Since it wouldn't exist. You may be thinking of Leninism/Maoism. Which are just authoritarian systems like fascism. Who aren't right or left any further than it becomes inconvenient for those in power.