Bro, you can't just announce a thing for it to be true. This would require at the least issuing shares or a transfer of existing shares from shareholders. That take's months. Well, it does to do it legally. I'd like to know what the largest shareholders think of the government annexing their money right out from under them.
Technology
Share interesting Technology news and links.
Rules:
- No paywalled sites at all.
- News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
- No external video links, only native(.mp4,...etc) links under 5 mins.
- Post only direct links.
To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:
- Al Jazeera;
- NBC;
- CNBC;
- Substack;
- Tom's Hardware;
- ZDNet;
- TechSpot;
- Ars Technica;
- Vox Media outlets(including Axios, due to new changes related to trackers on their website);
- Engadget;
- TechCrunch;
- Gizmodo;
- Futurism;
- PCWorld;
- ComputerWorld;
- Mashable;
- Hackaday;
- WCCFTECH;
- Neowin;
- Jacobin;
- Yahoo;
- Freethink;
- Big Think;
- Newsweek.
More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.
Encouraged:
- Archive links in the body of the post.
- Linking to the direct source, instead of linking to an article talking about the source.
Misc:
Relevant Lemmy Communities:
Don't worry, the shares will come from the retirement saving of people like you and me. Trumps golf buddies will be fine.
I'm just saying, it's either a full-on lie or there's a shitstorm going on in multiple boardrooms right now.
none of this shit makes sense. "US paid nothing for these shares" vs US will make a 8.9 billi investment, and the remaining billions already given to them.
Also, he's gone so far right he's making the state own things, coming out the other side to communism (insert the correct left wing government term here)? the fuck?
Workers don't exactly own the US government to consider a stake in intel to be anything of the sort.
In a sense Intel has been 10% nationalized, which really doesn't mean much for the working class.
In a stateless society, the state owning anything would be impossible. Since it wouldn't exist. You may be thinking of Leninism/Maoism. Which are just authoritarian systems like fascism. Who aren't right or left any further than it becomes inconvenient for those in power.
fully owns and controls
10%
I fully own and control 0.000001% or whatever of the companies I have stocks in too, I guess.
So Trumps is pretending to be a communist so he doesn't have to credit Biden for the chips act...
Does this mean the U.S. gets to own a percentage of EVERY company benefiting from U.S. government contracts and grants?