this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
116 points (99.2% liked)

World News

56110 readers
1589 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As this article says, Zelenskyy has said this on Twitter:

We are entirely justified in our responses against Russia’s oil industry, military production, and those directly responsible for committing war crimes against Ukraine and Ukrainians.

Do you agree with him?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I do mostly agree with him, but the answer is more difficult than a simple yes or no.

In this article from 2022, back when Russia was only attacking Ukraine, the question was posed the other way around. When is a target military and when is it civilian? And when is a civilian target a legitimate target?

A power station is (most often) civilian infrastructure, but can become a legitimate target to directly reduce military capabilities when the military draws power from that station. Military production facilities are also legitimate targets, as are oil facilities that provide fuel to the army.

But an oil terminal used for export is civilian infrastructure that does not directly benefit the army, but rather indirectly through a series of steps.

  • It exports the oil or LNG,
  • which generates income for companies,
  • that may directly or indirectly generate funds for the government.
  • The government can then move the funds to the military,
  • that can then use it to buy more weapons,
  • with which they can attack Ukraine.

If it was Russia attacking an oil terminal in Ukraine (or US / Israel in Iran, or Iran in UAE or SA for that matter) I would say these attacks were not justified and were actually war crimes. And I would be backed by international law, because the civilian repercussions would have been greater than the military ones. A country at war will just reallocate their budget, so the military will still buy their weapons.

But since it is a country that is defending itself against an aggressor that has been targeting civilian areas for years now, these attacks on civilian infrastructure in Russia will actually help diminish civilian deaths (on the Ukrainian side).

So, with that being said, they are justified imo, but some targets moreso than others.