this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
248 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

84699 readers
4874 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

RISC-V already exists so why not build on that?

[–] SubstituteTurkey@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It said RISC-V is decades away

"There is no immediate solution. RISC-V, the open source processor architecture European sovereignty advocates point to as a long-term alternative, remains years from competitive performance in datacenter workloads. "It will take decades,""

[–] zarenki@lemmy.ml 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

RISC-V is more like 1-3 years away from CPUs existing that have competitive performance in datacenter workloads. Not decades.

But they won't be manufactured in Europe. Getting fabs up and running is indeed something that takes a very long time.

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

RISC-V is more like 1-3 years away from CPUs existing that have competitive performance in datacenter workloads. Not decades

I’ve been hearing this for the past five years.

People seem to forget that if one arch moves forward, so do every single competitor out there.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

RISC-V isn't in the same scenario. There's one company behind ARM with a few external companies with architecture licenses (who doesn't share their contributions), and ARM competes mostly just on the same commercial terms so for a long time it wasn't worth investing in single core performance because they could instead fill the efficiency niche.

Also there's more knowledge on how to build high performance cores. Doesn't mean it's trivial, but it means the lead isn't several decades. With enough investment you can make it happen faster. And there's a national security motivation for investing.

[–] SubstituteTurkey@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

That may be so (hopefully), I'm just a layman quoting an expert.