I hear some people say Spanish is hard but that looks tame in comparison to Japanese since first of all Spanish uses the Latin Alphabet with additional letters while Japanese does NOT use that at all (due to them having Kanji, Hiragana & Katakana). The reason why Spanish by some is considered “easy” are the amount of cognates present (i.e. reality > realidad) but the same word in Japanese translates to 現実 which is different, you get the picture.
The sentence structure in Japanese differs from both Spanish & English as it’s SOV while both Spanish & English are SVO that can screw speakers of ES & EN at first as it’s reverse of both languages, so keep in mind. Like this:
The real challenge for native speakers of both Spanish & English is Kanji as it’s logographic and the numerous readings a single character has (take into account of nanori, kunyomi & onyomi) which isn’t the case for an English speaker learning Spanish as the alphabet and writing systems are basically the same. I mean there are elements of Spanish that make it hard to learn (gender cases, subjunctive mood, verb conjugations, etc).
I mean, why do some people consider Spanish hard despite it using the same alphabet? (Although they are NOT part of the same linguistic branch, since English is considered Germanic like Dutch while Spanish is part of the Romance language group like Portuguese). But, in saying that: does that still make Japanese hard or rather simple when you take grammar, writing system, levels of politeness or formal speech into account?
spanish could be considered harder because it has a shit ton of personal pronouns and a lot of verb conjugations based on formality, time, and a lot of other shit, so you need to remember a lot these which makes it quite hard. japanese has some verb conjugation but it's way easier in comparison to spanish. i say that if you'd remove kanji from the formulation spanish is harder, otherwise yeah, that complicates things a lot in japanese.
Hoo boy, if you want to talk about vocabulary and grammar changes based on formality, that's like Japanese's whole thing.
One thing nobody's mentioned in this thread is counters, which are little helper words attached to numbers. Which one you should use depends on what is being counted, the categories are highly idiosyncratic and generally have nothing to do with their ordinary use (e.g. 本, which elsewhere means "book" is the counter for long thin objects like pens or bananas), and there are dozens of them.
Spanish is more inflectional than Japanese. Keigo, the more respectful forms, holds cultural nuance, yes; but it isn't standardly required for meaning.
Japanese is the more foreign language, but I've felt fairly let-off-the-hook as far as inflection goes.
i suspect that spanish has japanese beat in this regard because of its relatively larger geographical dissemination makes formality based grammar rules incompatible with each other -- effectively making all incompatible versions technically correct despite literally contradicting each other.
it's one of the reasons why a majority of non-spanish speakers are taught european spanish rather than any of the SIGNIFICANTLY larger versions of spanish that exist.