this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
7 points (100.0% liked)
Trippin' Through Time
6798 readers
205 users here now
Tripping' Through Time
A Lemmy community for historic art pieces overhauled into modern memes.
Rules
- Only image uploads allowed
- Only edited, historical images may be shared
- The instance rules of https://lemmy.ca/
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's funny, cuz 35 really wasn't ancient, it was just lucky. People didn't live shorter lives on average, they'd frequently die super-young.
It's kinda like mechanical hard drive failure rates: if a hard drive is gonna prematurely fail, it usually happens within the first two years. After the first two years, you're expected to see a reasonable lifetime with your hard drive. Even then, it's normal to expect less than a 2% early failure rate. So, if your hard drive fails early, you're one of the unlucky few.
If we were to elevate that premature failure rate to 20%, you'd see a significant drop in the average lifespan of hard drives. And if you were one of those unlucky 1 in 5 whose hard drive failed at less than 2 years, then you'd be like, "well, guess I had a bad one." But if your hard drive made it past the two-year mark, you'd be one of those other 80% of people whose hard drives should last an expected 5-7 years.
If that same hard drive then failed after 3 years, you'd be like, "shit, that's a really short time for my hard drive to last past the two-year window." And then you'd be in a newer, more exclusive category of hard drives that didn't die before 2 years, but still died at a point that would be considered young.
So, it's not like everyone died at 30, they just had really high premature failure rates. Dying at 30 was seen as a bit of an oddity.
Only Lemmy would use the analogy of hard drive failure rates to explain this.