this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
478 points (81.1% liked)

memes

21266 readers
2272 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jagermo@feddit.org 135 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Yes. Both, not either or. Where is that shitty competition thinking coming from?

[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 4 points 8 hours ago

A lot of it comes from conservative AstroTurf.

And, unfortunately, a lot of it comes from farmers and other people living in rural areas, who see fields of crops being turned into solar farms and think "these panels are ugly, these panels are industrial, these panels are taking up fertile farmland" and see it as just one more way the government is exploiting rural areas for the benefit of the cities.

They're wrong, of course, but rural America has been abandoned and neglected and made the dumping ground for all sorts of polluting industries for so long I can't blame them for thinking that way.

[–] notabot@piefed.social 59 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The cynic in me suspects it's an attempt to sow division within pro-solar panel groups. Get them arguing amongst themselves over where to put them, rather than uniting to push for more panels.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 7 points 13 hours ago

Yeah I really hate this post, and how often it seems to surface on lemmy. Agrivoltaics is good for energy and for the plants*!

*Some exclusions apply. Not all plants grow better with the added shade.

[–] Ibisalt@lemmy.world 48 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

In Switzerland, there was a vote on a petition requiring new houses to include solar panels. Conservatives opposed it, arguing that construction costs were already too high without such regulations. Instead, those same people want to build massive solar farms on untouched natural landscapes. To me, the reason is obvious: energy companies want to maintain control over a centralized power infrastructure. This way, they can keep charging us high electricity prices while pocketing subsidies for infrastructure projects.

[–] blarth@thelemmy.club 12 points 17 hours ago

Ding ding ding that is correct!

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org -3 points 13 hours ago

no, it's one thing to allow solar panels on houses, but a completely other thing to require them. i'm against the requirement as well. there's absolutely no sane reason for that besides making people uncomfortable if they don't want them. if they want them, they can already get them.

[–] NinePeedles@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago

Put them everywhere. I don't care where they go. I want my son and daughter to have a planet to enjoy and raise a family in.