this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
18 points (95.0% liked)

Forgotten Weapons

1991 readers
47 users here now

This is a community dedicated to historical arms, mechanically unique arms, and Ian McCollum's Forgotten Weapons content.

Posts requesting an identification of a particular gun (or other arm) are welcome.

https://www.youtube.com/@ForgottenWeapons

https://www.forgottenweapons.com/

Rules:

1) Treat Others in a Civil Manner. Personal insults of other members are not welcome here. Neither are calls for violence.

2) No Contemporary Politics Historical politics that influenced designs or adoption of designs are excluded from this rule. Acknowledgement of existing laws to explain designs is also permissible, so long as comments aren't in made to advocate or oppose a policy.

3) No Advertising This rule doesn't apply to posting historical advertisements or showing more contemporary ads as a means of displaying information on an appropriate topic. The aim of this rule is to combat spam/irrelevant advertising campaigns.

4) Keep posts and discussions on Topic Keep it related to arms or Forgotten Weapons or closely adjacent content.

5) NSFW content must be marked, and is only acceptable if it is on topic. NSFW means gore or nudity. If such content is somehow on topic and is not just posted for shock value it may be allowed but must be marked.

Post Guide Lines

These are suggestions not rules.

-Provide a duration for videos. eg. [12:34]

-Provide a year to either indicate when a specific design was produced, patented, or released. If you have an older design being used in a recent conflict provide the year the picture was taken. Dates should be included to help contextualize, not necessarily give exact periods.

-Post a full URL, on mobile devices it can be hard to tell what you're clicking on if you only see "(Link)".

-Posts do not have to be just firearms. Blades, bows, etc. are also welcome.

Adjacent Communities

If you run a community that you feel might fit in dm a mod and we might add your's.

Want to Find a Museum Near You? Check out the mega thread: https://lemmy.world/post/9699481

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was able to take these photos recently at the Rock Island Arsenal museum.

This is listed as an XM16E1 lower that was used as a testbed for features that would eventually lead to the M16A2. Why and how this XM16E1 lower is fenced is something of a mystery to me, but that's what both the display and front desk said.

The two most notable features are the "Brunton bump" which is a massive brass deflector built into the upper.

The other is the proto-A2 rear sight. In this version there is a hole in the carry handle allowing the shooter to see the drum setting.

The windage adjustment knob is squared rather than cut at an angle on the end like the final A2 sight.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This actually has an A1 grip, though it also has what appears to be an A2 stock.

Up front it has a heavy barrel that appears A2 but is fitted with an A1 flash hider.

The paint camo is a little strange for a design test rifle, but it takes almost no time to spraypaint so maybe the testers were bored.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Oh for sure it does, it looked like a weird A2 angle without the finger groove at first to me, no clue why. The flash hider is weird too, the A1s were three prongs, but the A2s had the bottom of the birdcage closed off like we're used to, but this appears to be a fully open birdcage or improperly timed and we're looking at the "top" of the FH, hard to tell from the pic. Nothing on this gun makes sense lmao, it's cool.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The three prong flash hider was on the M16 and XM16E1.

The M16A1 had an enclosed birdcage that had slots all the way around.

The M16A2 had an enclosed birdcage without slots on the bottom.

Trust me I checked all the visible bits from every angle I could find. This is an A1 birdcage for sure.

M16 vs M16A1:

Here's the clearest photo I could find on the fly showing off an M16A1's flash hider that's unambiguously a Vietnam period pic:

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Huh neat, I've definitely seen A1s with three prongs in pics before, I guess sometimes parts probably just got swapped around as time went on (well they for sure did later, but I guess maybe earlier than I thought). Makes me feel better about the inaccurate frankenstein clone build I'm working on haha, technically I need an a1 upper but it's getting an a2 becsuse I like them more and have a spare.

Cool Nam pic too, interesting he has his sling tied to the FSB instead of the sling mount, looks like a strip of ripped cloth or something.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

As far as I'm concerned a repro that's using backwards compatible parts is perfectly accurate. Sometimes repro builders get a little too hung up on what something is by the book rather than what it became in the field.

For the sling, yes mounting the front on the FSB is something you can see a lot in Vietnam. M16s were designed with all the sling points facing down, which reflects the existing doctrine of the time and the earlier doctrines that considered slings something used for marching and transport, but that rifles should be entirely unslung in combat. The M16s and Commando carbines (with the later carbine having their buttstock slingpoint facing up but the forward one down) were light enough that people started carrying them slung in combat, and figuring out that mounting slings on FSBs worked better.

At some point, which I unfortunately can't pinpoint, the doctrine flipped to follow what people in the field had figured out and the modern U.S. military teaches that rifles absolutely should be slung in combat. You can see in early Iraq soldiers and marines still attaching slings to FSBs, as well as a ton of using up or side facing Velcro mounting points to achieve a similar outcome.

Edit: Here's 80s and 90s Delta doing the same thing, giving a clearer view of the refined version of the technique.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It also looks tough to mount a sling to the swivel when you delete it and throw a 40mm tube there haha. Also did second from the bottom tape an optic to his carry handle? Surprised if that holds zero lol. Awesome pics!

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Sling swivels and slings can fit on a grenade launcher equipped rifle, either in standard position or reoriented to the side by an armorer but I'm sure FSB mounting looks more attractive to most grenadiers.

With carbines the swivels pretty much have to be shifted to the side, but again just removing them is a lot more attractive I think.

The Aimpoint is on a Weaver rail interfaced with the carry handle. The best I can tell, that tape is just there as extra assurance, similar to seeing zipties and 550 on other optics and PEQs as a last line of dummy defense.

Here's a repro builder's clear photos:

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Man I wish cameras back then had more pixels (or maybe the shot is just out of focus) I can't see that side attachment point at all, curious where they drilled the rivet hole for the sling swivel lol. Also never seen one of those grenadier sights before, that's pretty cool too.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Colt makes a little collar that fits on the barrel under the FSB. Attach it to one side or the other, and remove the existing swivel, no drilling required.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Neat, never seen one of those before either, we've come such a long way since then lol.