setsneedtofeed

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but my point is that his hyper-intelligence is to a point something we just have to believe in since he is being written by people who aren't hyper-intelligent themselves.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 22 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (5 children)

Rick Sanchez.

He's supposed to be the smartest person in the universe. The rub is that the writers aren't as smart as they want him to be, so that leads to them writing his enemies to be dumber than how smart they can write him, to preserve his in-universe superior intelligence.

He can make anything out of anything. He has cybernetic implants that can do anything the plot needs.

I actually like the show (a social crime in 2026) but being an overpowered, plot armored, walking deus ex machina is his gimmick.

123
submitted 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) by setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world to c/artshare@lemmy.world
 
[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's a green shield bug.

 
[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Senator Michaels took a folding chair from the top rope to the proposed highway grading study budget!

I camped out in front of a Blockbuster so I could buy a copy of Modern Warfare 2 on launch. I was one of the first people in the store so I got the special limited edition version that came in the the tin box.

 
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/47004062

From HKpro.com:

Operation of the HK-53 was modified so that the HK-53 fired from an open bolt instead of the traditional H&K method of firing from a closed bolt, as open-bolt operation allows for better cooling of the barrel and bolt mechanism and made the HK-53 more compatible with the XM-723’s need to vent firing gasses to the outside of the vehicle. Finally, the original HK53 fire control group mechanism was used, and the cyclic rate of the HK-53 was almost doubled as per the firing port weapon competition guidlines requirements. In the end however, the US Army decided to adopt an AR15/M16 patterned weapon instead, being designated the XM231. Colt was given the contract and continued to modify their design finalizing the weapon as the M-231 (NSN: 1005-01-081-4582) which was adopted by the US Army in August, of 1979. Undeterred, Heckler & Koch continued to improve and shop around the HK-53 MICV (particularly to the German Bundeswehr, who was at the time looking for a firing port weapon for their Marder IFV), but no military ever adopted the weapon so the HK-53 MICV eventually became one of those interesting designs that never went into use, and is now a very rare item.


From Forgotten Weapons:

The M231 Port Firing Weapon was developed in the 1970s as a part of the M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle Project. A modern relative of the WW2 Krummlauf, the weapon was intended to provide close-in firepower against infantry that might attempt to overrun the M2. It has no sights or buttstock, and fires from an open bolt only as 1100-1200 rounds/minute.

 

From HKpro.com:

Operation of the HK-53 was modified so that the HK-53 fired from an open bolt instead of the traditional H&K method of firing from a closed bolt, as open-bolt operation allows for better cooling of the barrel and bolt mechanism and made the HK-53 more compatible with the XM-723’s need to vent firing gasses to the outside of the vehicle. Finally, the original HK53 fire control group mechanism was used, and the cyclic rate of the HK-53 was almost doubled as per the firing port weapon competition guidlines requirements. In the end however, the US Army decided to adopt an AR15/M16 patterned weapon instead, being designated the XM231. Colt was given the contract and continued to modify their design finalizing the weapon as the M-231 (NSN: 1005-01-081-4582) which was adopted by the US Army in August, of 1979. Undeterred, Heckler & Koch continued to improve and shop around the HK-53 MICV (particularly to the German Bundeswehr, who was at the time looking for a firing port weapon for their Marder IFV), but no military ever adopted the weapon so the HK-53 MICV eventually became one of those interesting designs that never went into use, and is now a very rare item.


From Forgotten Weapons:

The M231 Port Firing Weapon was developed in the 1970s as a part of the M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle Project. A modern relative of the WW2 Krummlauf, the weapon was intended to provide close-in firepower against infantry that might attempt to overrun the M2. It has no sights or buttstock, and fires from an open bolt only as 1100-1200 rounds/minute.

 

 
 
 

The white was mostly sponging, I alternated greys and blacks with white again until it looked right. The bare metal was an intentionally uneven mix of brown and orange paints brushed on, and then a homemade red-brown wash applied.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wartime production Mk1 with a Mk2 stock?

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Green Light Teams have entered the chat.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Colt makes a little collar that fits on the barrel under the FSB. Attach it to one side or the other, and remove the existing swivel, no drilling required.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

OP really emphasized the full auto aspect of M16s, so in this case I think differentiating them from semi-auto AR-15 models is relevant when giving an answer.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Sling swivels and slings can fit on a grenade launcher equipped rifle, either in standard position or reoriented to the side by an armorer but I'm sure FSB mounting looks more attractive to most grenadiers.

With carbines the swivels pretty much have to be shifted to the side, but again just removing them is a lot more attractive I think.

The Aimpoint is on a Weaver rail interfaced with the carry handle. The best I can tell, that tape is just there as extra assurance, similar to seeing zipties and 550 on other optics and PEQs as a last line of dummy defense.

Here's a repro builder's clear photos:

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

As far as I'm concerned a repro that's using backwards compatible parts is perfectly accurate. Sometimes repro builders get a little too hung up on what something is by the book rather than what it became in the field.

For the sling, yes mounting the front on the FSB is something you can see a lot in Vietnam. M16s were designed with all the sling points facing down, which reflects the existing doctrine of the time and the earlier doctrines that considered slings something used for marching and transport, but that rifles should be entirely unslung in combat. The M16s and Commando carbines (with the later carbine having their buttstock slingpoint facing up but the forward one down) were light enough that people started carrying them slung in combat, and figuring out that mounting slings on FSBs worked better.

At some point, which I unfortunately can't pinpoint, the doctrine flipped to follow what people in the field had figured out and the modern U.S. military teaches that rifles absolutely should be slung in combat. You can see in early Iraq soldiers and marines still attaching slings to FSBs, as well as a ton of using up or side facing Velcro mounting points to achieve a similar outcome.

Edit: Here's 80s and 90s Delta doing the same thing, giving a clearer view of the refined version of the technique.

view more: next ›