Programmer Humor

31505 readers

2160 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Feyter@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

BurningTurtle@programming.dev

pylapp@programming.dev

821

Kind of impressive when you think about it (infosec.pub)

submitted 3 days ago by cm0002@infosec.pub to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

139 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] red_tomato@lemmy.world 66 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Their idea was that OpenAI was so far ahead of the competition no one could ever catch up. Turns out they weren’t and now they’re at the bottom.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Google: "We Have No Moat, And Neither Does OpenAI". Prophetic words.

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

It's so beautiful to read a giant corporation realise that they are hopeless and have no game to play.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub -5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

At the bottom? Is there a single LLM that has surpassed ChatGPT?

EDIT: I missed Gemini 3.1 pro

Still, saying "Everyone else catched up and it's at the bottom now" is seriously out of touch thing to say

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Claude

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Claude outperforms in coding and agentic tasks. I asked about LLM as a chat model. It's still in benchmarks at the top, and still the most popular one, by far.

Even with Claude, the difference isn't big and it's the only one that managed to surpass it in benchmarks, so.. still - at the bottom? You sure about that?

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The context was about coding specifically tho

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I was directly questioning the "at the bottom" phrase, not the entire context. Context matters, or something

That being said:

Benchmarks

Source