this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
21 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

1320 readers
73 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Shaggy0291@lemmygrad.ml
GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml
SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml
QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
yogthos@lemmygrad.ml
21
How do you explain that socialism is more democratic? (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 2 days ago by marl_karx@lemmygrad.ml to c/asklemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

How do you argue with someone to explain why Marxism-Leninism is more democratic than western liberal democracy, when they are deeply propagandized to think that only the western democracy is democratic and just and say that rich people are needed to make the economy work etc (all the usual talking points). I am not very good at this, when I say our democracy is not democratic they said I sound insane

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

The only general limitation on party expenses is the ability to raise funds from private contributors. Due to a supreme court ruling (see below in History), public subsidies to a specific party may not exceed the "self-generated revenue", i.e. the total amount raised from signed-up members and other donors ("relative maximum", "relative Obergrenze"). Thus, a party that is unable to collect enough contributions from private sources will see its public subsidy reduced automatically[15] and be unable to make all the expenditure that it would like to.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_finance_in_Germany

This is a really advantageous arrangement for capital. If a party doesn't have significant private funds raised, they are unable to gather public funding.

https://www.bundesbank.de/resource/blob/908924/3ef9d9a4eaeae8a8779ccec3ac464970/mL/2023-04-vermoegensbefragung-data.pdf