802
submitted 1 year ago by octiman to c/technology@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Overall I agree with you: the government is not trustable to own and manage this service and especially all of the data itself.

I think legislative protection for this function is a good thing, to create a legal protected space for it to operate, while still having it actually operated by the private sector.

The ideal solution, IMO, is for the service to be decentralized onto a blockchain or some other kind of decentralized data store, and have a variable number of nodes running it in a redundant manner so that no single node’s loss leads to loss of data or the service itself.

This is a universal good, one I’d be happy to help “pay for” in the form of dedicating computing resources to it.

IMO all the functions of democracy (including in this case the maintenance of historical memory) should ideally be decentralized enough to be immune to attack by any organization up to and including armies.

[-] x3i@lemmy.x3i.tech 1 points 1 year ago

Except for blockchain as a technology, I agree with you; decentralization and thus democratization of all these things would be best!

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
802 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37443 readers
540 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS