this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
49 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
13829 readers
358 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Never heard of it. Nice domain. Claims to donate to charity every time you search. Makes 3rd party requests to
Compared to DDG-noAI: zero 3rd party requests.
Waterfox believe in charity so much, they made some sort of deal with a company that is making money with the idea of helping by making internet searches?
BTW, I use Librewolf.
1.org:
Seems like they would many more 3rd party requests than those four.
These are cookies. dropping cookies for 1011 partners does not require accessing their domains at that moment.
A 3rd-party request means that when a client (browser) loads a page, that page wants to load content from other domains. Strictly speaking, DDG does that too (see screenshot below): it loads extra content from one of its _sub_domains.
Still, good catch. Where'd you find that?
And btw it's of course perfectly possible that DDG does that too; I never meant to claim absolute superiority for it. Just for comparison. It's my default search engine right now but I should try something better I guess.
The number of partners is in the cookie banner from onetrust when opening the site (maybe location dependent?). I'm aware it doesn't mean they necessarily are making 3rd party http requests (feels likely though?), but when a site has such a ridiculous amount of partners, it is a huge red flag.
But it's not surprising, if they donate to charity, for each search request, they have to generate income somehow...
Some ublock origin list probably block all cookie banner.
Do you mean Librewolf? Librefox looks dead.
oops, fixed
No need when they're already selling your search habits from the backend.