this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
14 points (100.0% liked)

WomensStuff

1105 readers
412 users here now

Women only trans inclusive This is an inclusive community for all things women. Whether you're here for make up tips, feminism or just friendly chit chat, we've got you covered.

Rules…

  1. Women only… trans women are women, and transphobic or gender critical talk isn’t allowed. Anyone under the trans umbrella (e.g. non-binary, bigender, agender) is free to decide whether a women's community is a good fit for them.
  2. Don’t be a dick. No personal attacks, no aggression, play nice.
  3. Don’t hate on groups, hatefilled talk about groups is not allowed. Ever.
  4. No governmental politics, so no talk of Trump actions etc. We recommend Feminism@beehaw.org for that, but here is an escape from it.
  5. New accounts or users with few comments may have their posts removed to prevent spam and bad-faith participation.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I understood what you originally meant, for what it's worth.

Maybe "When a man is comfortable enough in his own masculinity that his partner being the breadwinner isn't an issue." or something like that.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

How can we do it without subtle jabs to masculinity? Everyone should be equal

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This weird over-sensitivity made me suspicious. So I looked. And I unsurprisingly found.

I’m a tall male, so if you aren’t you might enjoy a lower dose more.

Dude. It's literally two words. Which one did you not understand?

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 1 points 1 hour ago

I don’t understand. I was prescribed 5mg at first, and it was less effective than 10mg. I felt it was not working. I’m just sharing my experience. Being that I’m a a larger individual, it takes a higher dose of most things. They might start lower for them—but I don’t want them to write it off if they aren’t experiencing positive results immediately.

I’m curious what wild imaginary journey you are on that brought you to harassing me. What completely fabricated reality are you experiencing that you feel your comments are acceptable?

[–] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Oh I didn't think that was a jab at masculinity. Masculinity can be positive and men and women can express masculinity.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Well, using the word chivalry in 2026 is pretty sexist imo. The definition is more knightly in origin, with another example being men courteous to women. Clearly from another time. I think we can just retire this word—o😚OP seems to be asking for a semantic shift to an already established word. 🤷‍♂️

[–] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely agree on the word chivalry being outdated.

Word evolution and etymology are always interesting topics to banter about. Chivalry clearly has a different modern definition than it's origins. Maybe we could help redefine it further? Or come up with another way of expressing something similar.

Like, I think women can be chivalrous. Does that inherently balance the definition or is chivalry always considered a male trait?

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t think the modern definition is clear at all. Which is why we are here.

I think the word should be decommissioned, as well as the concept of any gender treating any other gender differently than they would treat their own.

If someone asks, “how should a man treat a woman?” The answer should always be, “like a man would treat a man.”

Maybe I’m just too damn chivalrous. ;)

[–] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I just said the modern version is clearly different, not that the definition itself is clear.

....Do you think I'm arguing with you?

I don't agree that being chivalrous inherently means treating different genders differently.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I didn’t mean to sound as if this was an argument.

[–] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 hours ago

Ok cool, just checking. It's hard to read tone in text and sometimes I misjudge it!