119
Trump’s $1.8B ‘slush fund’ appears to violate a mandate created more than a year ago: legal experts
(www.independent.co.uk)
this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
119 points (98.4% liked)
news
977 readers
490 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Sigh. I don't care anymore. I don't even want to hear what laws it breaks, what mandates it breaks, whatever. I don't what to hear who is on blast, and I don't want to hear who is on notice.
There. Are. Never. Any. Consequences.
All of this has become the theater of the absurd.
Right? The best case scenario I could even fathom hoping for would be that it gets blocked by some miracle.
Thinking that there are any consequences of any kind is pure delusion. That the maga chuds will realize that he's a criminal and stop supporting him? not happening. That those responsible for this blatantly corrupt attempt will be brought to any kind of justice? pure fantasy.