this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
313 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

84918 readers
3408 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dexa_scantron@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

LLMs are not and will never be good enough to replace human labor. Augment it, sure, and that could lead to fewer jobs but that's not generally what happens. They are, however, good enough for execs to think they can replace human labor.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The AI doesn't need to be better than the professional it's replacing, it just needs to be more cost effective than the barely capable outsourced worker the jobs was going to be given anyway.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 4 points 23 hours ago

Not really, because when an employee fails their task it's the employee's responsibility, and if it's catastrophic enough it can lead to firings or lawsuits. But as soon as it's a chatbot, the liability fully rests on the company. How long will insurance protect those companies too?

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They don't have to be as good to replace us.

[–] farting_gorilla@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It even can be a feature if AI isn't as good as the people they are replacing. For example, in the case of call centers/help lines, it might be more desirable to have a shitty system to discourage callers yet have plausible deniability…

I find I'm referencing Cory Doctorow a lot lately…

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 4 points 23 hours ago

The issue is that those bots are worse in completely unpredictable ways. Like when some airline passengers were given incorrect information which led to the airline being sued and having to pay the made up offer as well as damages & tribunal fees. The bots might be unhelpful, but to the disservice of the company's financials

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I was in a meeting at a credit card company about 2 decades ago where a VP said exactly that - without the AI part.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago

The AI won't replace labor, automation/robotics will do that. AI will provide the brain to operate the automation properly. We've had the automation for a long time, the AI is making the difference.

They are working very hard on the intersection of AI and Automation to replace human labor.