this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
198 points (97.6% liked)

Selfhosted

50711 readers
727 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Assuming the user will not be connecting over vpn, but is both remote and non-technical, how would you expose Jellyfin to them securely?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'm kinda disappointed with this thread, I'm in a similar position to OP, but all the responses are just like "use a reverse proxy and make your URL hard to guess" and other measures which are not very secure. \

It seems like that's about as good as you can get at the moment, because the mobile apps barf if you try to add in auth in front of the reverse proxy, but a lot of people seem to be providing this advice like it's good enough rather than as good as you can get.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well yeah, the "good as you can get" answers are "use a VPN" or "don't".

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So every answer is as good as you can get?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

I suppose it depends on what you mean by "good as you can get".

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Im confused as to what people think the security issue is? Do they think someone will brute force their username and password with a billion queries?

[–] mko@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago

That’s assuming an attacker will play nice with URL forming and discovering edge cases in POSTing shaped data to the service. Just encrypting is still weak security if the whole front-end web and API surface isn’t hardened.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Afraid people will use known vulnerabilities in common self-hosted software.

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sorry but are you guy not using Linux as your servers? Windows? Now I understand.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Did you just suggest Linux has no vulnerabilities in any of its distros, and neither does any of the self-hosted services?