492
Google CEO Sundar Pichai says graduates booing AI will shape its future — and live with its consequences
(www.businessinsider.com)
this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
492 points (96.1% liked)
Technology
84938 readers
3447 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why the double quotes?
Because LLMs and similar generative “AI” tools aren't intelligent.
Nor, arguably, are they artificial, since the models are grown rather than built.
What is intelligence? Also, I think artificial refers to the fact that they don't have life.
Thanks.
Because signal matching and manipulation is not intelligence unless you're willing to admit that is all you are capable of.
AI tools don't actively manipulate people. They're just confident about their answers as they should be.
I meant signal manipulation, but sure, that includes manipulating humans since we are just another signal input. That isn't a statement on values, just an objective description of how it works.
I still don't understand how it cannot be as intelligent as us.
That "intelligence" will tell you how it is not as intelligent if you ask directly. This is not because it's intelligent and KNOWS it's limitations but because it picked up on my signal for what I wanted and gave something resembling that to me. You could ask it the opposite thing and arrive at a very different conclusion. https://claude.ai/share/97859aae-beb2-4245-a8b1-460122ee4aa1
I would even say the analogies it gave aren't entirely accurate. A person reading a book experiences it very differently than an LLM. And this is a key insight to an element of the Turing test where you ask it to explain some poetry (not simply write a poem).
While I agree that it doesn't have a physical experience, I don't think a physical experience is necessary to speak to someone.
I meant LLMs and people experience reading a book differently in the internal sense. Or at least for some people.
Of course! We hallucinate being in the character's place. The LLM can't experience that because it has no emotions.
In any case, unless you're talking about emotional intelligence, I don't think that's necessary to be intelligent.
I think they meant signal matching and signal manipulation