this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
217 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

84938 readers
3781 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/64500038

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 52 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Yup. We knew this. But they won't let us buy the affordable cars because that sort of free market would put US companies out of business.

In this country, we have the FREEDOM to buy any overpriced domestic or foreign (assuming they're on the list of good foreign countries) tank-sized SUV you want.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

A lot of people don't realize that the big car thing is due to government regulation. X footprint vehicle must attain Y MPG lest fines or what have you, so manufacturers are legitimately being incentivized to make larger ballooned out vehicles because that puts them in a different bracket for mpg requirements that's easier to attain. This is why the new 3 series is bigger than the old 5 series, etc

[–] belochka@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I've read this happened because sometime in the 80s comrade Reagan decided to own the Japanese instead of letting competition do its work (for cars, but with electronics similar things followed). He's somehow often associated with liberal capitalism and so on, but the guy believed that "monopolies are efficient", but at the same time by some magic if a monopoly stops being efficient, then all the capital and technology base for competition to replace it will just materialize in one place in one moment all by themselves. So I'm not even sure if "comrade" is irony. The ironic part is that the US president whose term coincided with Soviet system conclusively losing the Cold War is also the one who supported state capitalism and ideologic pressure in society.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 20 points 23 hours ago

Who ever thought the US would be a place where the federal government would prevent you from buying the coolest cars and coolest drones? Lame.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, you're living in state capitalism in the USA these days.