this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
209 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

84938 readers
3757 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/64500038

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kungen@feddit.nu 11 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Wasn't this already well-known? An internal combustion engine is less effective already from the start compared to "modern" fossil energy power production. Even if the energy came 100% from coal, there wouldn't be too much difference anyways.

The only thing electric cars are worse for, environmentally, is increased tyre wear due to weight. And then the battery production/disposal of course...

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 10 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Even if the energy came from 100% black coal, EVs still have less emissions than ICE

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Do you have a source? Last I read the only time ICE beat EV in emissions was when electric came from coal fired plants.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 12 hours ago

About 30% less.

Goes to show how inefficient an engine is that runs on explosions. A gear shifter is a necessity just to keep it running at optimum rotation, otherwise it would be even less efficient.