this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
830 points (99.4% liked)
memes
21365 readers
2902 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"are" makes it plural
if the sentence had "is" instead, it would be singular: there is no pig
But they are asking with the number zero specifically. "There is zero pig" is not how we speak.
good point. "there is zero [noun]" doesn't work whether the noun is plural or not. only when you use "no" instead of "zero"
i've only ever spoken english and it still confounds me. why do we say "hands" but we don't say "foots"?
why don't "good" and "food" rhyme?
why does "feed" become "fed," but "weed" becomes "weeded"? meanwhile "wed" and "wedded" mean the same thing
lol
If you insist on "is" then "zero" doesn't work. But if you use "are" the sentence, "There are zero pigs" is totally cromulant. That's because "pigs" in that sentence is addressing the category.