United Kingdom

6708 readers

297 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

Nearly 500 seriously injured in e-scooter collisions in Great Britain last year (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 day ago by Veserr@sh.itjust.works to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

You missed a lot. There are so many things wrong with a statement like this.

A global comparison necessarily includes roads all over the country, the bulk of which being intercity motorways. Given that motorways and local roads are maintained quite differently, for a discussion about the viability of our roads for use with scooters then, which don't use these roads, such a bias renders this metric useless.
It won't include surfaces which are likely to be used by scooters, such as pavements and cycle lanes, let alone the availability of either.
It's also likely not to include negative cultural norms like:
- Parking in cycle lanes
- Parking on pavements
- Double parking
- The average size of vehicles and the visibility the drivers have

The biggest problem though is that it's just a bad argument. Having roads better than another place does not make our roads "good". At best it establishes ourselves on a spectrum of mediocrity. I saw this constantly living in Canada where people would talk about our mass transit as "better than what they have in the US" like that's something to be proud of.

Our roads are objectively shit. Potholes are everywhere and the pavements are literally crumbling. For a scooter, these are all serious hazards because of the wheel diameter. Those are objective facts, so lets stop with this "well at least we're better off than ${someplace slightly shittier}" because it ignores the objective shitty state right in front of us.