this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
35 points (84.3% liked)

Technology

84996 readers
4621 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] markz@suppo.fi 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Humanoid robots is a fucking idiotic idea. It's just a massive waste. You make it the shape that works best for the task it's used for.

He might as well say that the future of lawn care is 1950s scifi humanoid robots that push traditional lawnmowers instead of just using those lawnmower roomba things.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I bet there is a place for both monolithic purpose-built industrial robots and less effective but more versatile robots.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 11 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

A traditional robot arm with a tool changer is already pretty versatile. What does the human shape add?

[–] felbane@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Seems like none of y'all even read a few paragraphs into the article.

A human-sized, human-shaped robot can integrate into an existing production layout without having to redesign how the factory works. That's the sell.

To me that's a thinly-veiled way of saying "these things are purpose built to uproot human workers as soon as fucking possible," which would be a great thing if the intent were to remove humans from dangerous and/or unfulfilling jobs and pipe the earnings from the cost reduction/efficiency increase into taxes/ubi/assistance programs so that people can pursue their own dreams and interests without needing to wage slave their healthiest years away trying to survive.

But that's never the intent; it's always to add more zeroes to the balance sheet of the people at the top.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 22 hours ago

Well, versatility. No need to redesign a new monolithic welder robot when the new car design is 1m longer or whatever. I mean there must be loads of things that change all the time.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The next wave needs to be more flexible to weird stuff than current purpose robots are. What that looks like though nobody knows yet. Some on Robotics have ideas but what will really work is unknown.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 2 points 22 hours ago

Yeah, weird sounds more likely.