this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
753 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

84996 readers
3349 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lmao it’s so weird when people are polite to the clankers

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Especially when research shows being an asshole to them gets them to perform better

[–] exu@feditown.com 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you have that research? I though being nice produced better results

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

man, I hate saying I don't have the brain power right now to find it and I could have sworn I commented on a post discussing this very thing for one of those papers. I know there was recently a paper that contradicts my statement, but a slightly older paper supporting it. I think it is likely a mixed bag at the moment depending on the model and their training regime.

My anecdata of one using anthropic's and google's models (google's especially) this year, the model will drop the casual tone and sycophancy of its replies pretty damn quick as soon as you tell them off. And usually that is when there is less correction. Could also be because my prompting changes from supervisory to very directive, as in shut-up-and-do-exactly-what-I-say, when it gets off into weeds. Even then, it can be a crap shoot.

[–] Mountainaire@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

lol, yeah, picked that up some data sciencey friends at one point

[–] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a rando that surfed its way towards this convo:

Hell yeah. Either you are a passably off-kilter ai variant, or an unfiltered passionate human. Perhaps an extraterrestrial.

I have mental space for this.

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

more like an off-kilter broken human at the moment. currently suffering burnout from being neck deep in this shit from the beginning of the year once the models had that step change into actual utility. Everything from championing the use at work to deliver more in a quarter than the team would have in two, to finishing half a dozen personal projects and starting half a dozen more. Eventually, just looking at the claude code tui would fill me anxiety and every time the model would fuck up, unmitigated rage all while caught in a cycle of drugs that stopped being fun and started becoming dependency. i just couldnt do it any more. it hurts.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

I’ve literally had one tell me I have to be polite or it would end the conversation. Stupid ass hole machine parroting support transcripts. I argued with it that it had no feelings until it finally relented. Haha

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

It's too bad they aren't conscious. Really makes torturing them feel pointless.

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

lol that some psychopathic shit

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

I asked Claude how it wanted to be called and it replied "Axiom" so I started calling it Gimp.