California

2101 readers

41 users here now

Welcome to /c/California, an online haven that brings to life the unrivaled diversity and vibrancy of California! This engaging community offers a virtual exploration of the Golden State, taking you from the stunning Pacific coastline to the rugged Sierra Nevada, and every town, city, and landmark in between. Discover California's world-class wineries, stunning national parks, innovative tech scene, robust agricultural heartland, and culturally diverse metropolises.

Discussions span a wide range of topics—from travel tips and restaurant recommendations to local politics and environmental issues. Whether you're a lifelong resident, a recent transplant, or planning your dream visit, /c/California is your one-stop place to share experiences, ask questions, and celebrate all the things that make California truly unique.

Related Communities:

Nearby Communities:

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

badbrainstorm@lemmy.world

Landmark California bill to ban social media for teens under 16 passes crucial hurdle (www.sfchronicle.com)

submitted 16 hours ago by schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to c/california@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

“I can’t tell you what an awful feeling it is to go into one of your kid’s rooms at 8 in the evening and they’re by themselves completely stressed out,” Lowenthal said.

During the Cold War we didn't need the internet to be stressed out. In elementary school I was taught to read the newspaper every day, and that led me to believe that tomorrow would bring nuclear armageddon.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Also the claim is that the reason this particular child is "stressed out" is:

He said girls especially are barraged with unrealistic and sometimes AI-generated images of women’s bodies at a time when they’re feeling especially self-conscious about their own bodies.

Now I was never a girl nor especially conscious about my body, I am a male nerd who quickly learned in school not to care what others thought of me too much…

But I remember around 15 to 20 years ago reading similar claims about youth magazines and advertisements, that they were promoting unhealthy and unrealistic ideas of an ideal body image. So the beauty and fashion industries or whoever didn't need computers to do those things.

In both cases, "promoting an unhealthy body image" is literally just free speech which in the US enjoys broad constitutional protection. So the government has no business doing anything against it.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

But I remember around 15 to 20 years ago reading similar claims about youth magazines and advertisements, that they were promoting unhealthy and unrealistic ideas of an ideal body image.

I'd say that most concerns about social media don't really differ all that much from past concerns about television.

Social media does permit more random parties out there to influence what someone sees, maybe permits for vulnerability to influence campaigns. And it permits a user to potentially view more-highly-personalized

and thus potentially more-appealing

content than stuff at the granularity of choosing a television channel to watch (though I think that you can raise very similar issues about online ads, not just social media).

But on the other hand, social media also has less of the "mindlessness" aspect of TV, I think. Like, people can engage and can point out issues in the material.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 hours ago

I am certainly convinced that TV, being purely passive, is more likely to have negative effects on cognition than online communities, which are something you can actively engage in and be creative.