this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
96 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

85038 readers
3447 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Cookie questions unfortunately are required by law in the EU so don’t meet Gruber’s own definition.

That said the EU needs to force browser makers to respect a set of more granular “do not tracks” settings and then just read the “necessary/functional/settings/marketing” acceptance from there.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

Exactly, we should be able to set the cookie settings on the phone or computer and have the device apply them to every website, as we see fit, rather than deal with a pop up and subsequent screens every web page to reject cookies.

[–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Meanwhile you can use the Consent-O-Matic extension. You set your preference once and auto applies to the all websites.

[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 2 points 12 hours ago

Yeah it sort of works.

[–] ClassyHatter@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The law doesn’t require cookie questions to be dickovers.

[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

No, the dark patterns are terrible.

[–] exu@feditown.com 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Cookie banners are not required if all you use are actually necessary cookies instead of sharing data with 395 of your partners.

[–] snrkl@lemmus.org 9 points 1 day ago
[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But functional cookies also need approval, no?

[–] mschae@discuss.mschae23.de 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As far as I know (and I'm not 100 % sure), no. You don't even need to inform users that you use functional cookies. Most likely because these work for the person using your website, not against them (persisting the session, settings, and so on).

[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I looked it up; you are right. Strictly necessary cookies do not need consent.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 4 points 15 hours ago

Those banners that include necessary cookies are all misdirection so they can make the whole more confusing.

Like how sites want you to believe ads are now worthless if they are not targeted and being fed all of your private data. Untargeted ads used to remunerate them just fine before that was an option.