I feel like having to do moderation on the instance level is just not a good idea, because it just leads to scenarios like this. Unless an instance was just set up to send spam, in which case blocking it site-wide is obviously the best thing to do, you're always going to cut off actual people who post from there.
At least on Lemmy, moderation can also be done on the community level, which actually have a topic they can enforce.
I like the different approach some games take, like Minecraft's “advancements”. They're per save, so mods don't disable them (in fact, many mods add their own), and a nice indicator of how much progress you've made in a world already.
And people who care about “completing” a game can still do that in a single save and show off the advancement progress window there (although it can be cheated just like in any game).
There's just no global statistics anymore.
Also reading through the post linked at the end that has more details, this proposal actually seems pretty well-designed. Most importantly, it's very easy to use, and that's important for accessibility features (otherwise no one will put these attributes on their websites).
Looking forward to being able to use this, but it's probably going to take a while for it to be accepted and implemented across browsers. Not sure what the process for that actually looks like.
“Following the recent discussion, we have strengthened our safeguards,” [OKA's] Zimmerman told me. “We are now rolling out a second, independent LLM review step. Translators must run the completed draft through a separate model using a dedicated comparison prompt designed to identify potential discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies relative to the source text. Initial findings suggest this is highly effective at detecting potential issues.”
Ah yes; when LLMs don't work, just add more LLMs. Genius.
They say it's been “highly effective” but somehow, I doubt that.
Oh that's true, I didn't consider that. I do usually copy the URL directly, because share buttons tend to add tracking parameters I'd have to remove manually. But I know many people don't even bother (or know about) that. Still, that's only the “share as link” button. Who knows how much the social share buttons actually get used.
I wonder if anyone actually uses any of these. I just can't imagine finding an article or something and wanting to share it this way, but I'm also not on Mastodon or other similar networks.
Now that I think about it, this might make the most sense for link aggregators, as that's just the kind of post you'd frequently share. Hm.
Time mixed cream cough for a berry, filled drop.
Yeah, that's the reasonable thing to do. Most uses of tangents are things I do want to see, but it's still helpful to enable the category in case something comes up in the video I don't care about.
When I enabled this niche aggressive category I wanted niche, aggressive segments. But on videos that I liked? This has gone too far. This category is censoring jokes, it is suppressing creative voices. I can't believe there are people out there, making this segments on these works of art. It's a comedy channel for God's sake! I get that this category is for jokes but these jokes are FUNNY! These submitters should be banned, as they clearly don't understand these guidelines. Oh they removed the jokes from LTT? That's fine their jokes are lame. Hey @sponsorblock@fosstodon.org how do I bulk upvote
Da wird Qobuz schon erwähnt (ehrlich gesagt unerwartet) und dann wird nicht einmal darauf eingegangen, dass man sich Musik dort auch kaufen kann. Ein bisschen schade eigentlich, schließlich umgeht man damit praktisch die Probleme des Streamens, was ja für den Artikel relevant gewesen wäre.