this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
53 points (93.4% liked)

World News

56316 readers
1716 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 26 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They have a pretty based take on Israel

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world -2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Ah yes of course. That one stance makes up for all the other bullshit South Africa does.

The Minister of Sports, Gayton McKenzie, didn't seem to have any problem travelling to Israel in 2023 and 2025 to seek deals to get Israeli water tech to south Africa. He sent a delegation to go to Israel and meet it's president, and guess what? They apparently found "no evidence of apartheid" there.

https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2025-04-10-south-african-mps-claim-no-evidence-of-apartheid-during-controversial-israel-fact-finding-mission/

[–] Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Ah yes, McKenzie who is the president of the Ultra Right wing opposition party (Patriotic Alliance), very racist, very corrupt (gang ties, bribery, embezzlement), and constantly tries to buddy up to Israel because I'm sure Israel doesn't have a vested interest to promote the opposition in a country calling out their apartheid - especially one that's just as xenophobic and racist as Israelis.

Probably best to look at who you're referencing when trying to muddy the waters.

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I know who he is. I'm not "muddying the waters". I don't get how you can appoint someone like that (a convicted criminal) to be the "Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture" after filling a case against Israel.

[–] Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

South Africa isn't a totalitarian state, it's a proportional representative Republic. Which means that if a party has X percentage of votes and seats, they get a seat. South Africa have the GNU (government of national unity) coalition and McKenzie said that he would walk away if he wasn't given a seat - thereby dissolving government. So he was given the sports ministry, the most insignificant position since the World Cup way back when. And in that role, he's just pushed his racist rhetoric and corruption

How can you appoint someone like that (a convicted criminal)

  • people serve their time and can run in elections and get voted in. Nelson Mandela did it.

So if someone wants to bring up something that they're not very informed about, it's called "muddying the waters" of discourse, especially when that person wants to try and push their rhetoric on whether Israel is apartheid and what South Africa's more accepted stance is on the topic.

Like, why even bring it up if you don't know much about the politics involved? What point are you arguing by saying that this voice in South African politics says that apartheid doesn't exist? Should we argue the Jim Crow policies didn't exist because some MAGAT said so and platform them?