Hi All,
Tldr:
- We are monitoring publically available information (posts, comments and DMs).
- Monitoring is turned off as soon as the admin team are satisfied the user is legitimate.
- will only temporary remove, no bans or deletion without a human being involved in the decision.
- No user data is sent off to 3rd party tools, all processing is done on the instance server. No LLMs are involved.
Due to some ongoing issues with harassment campaigns, we've had to setup a rudimentary monitoring system for all new users.
- When a user's signup is accepted, they will be automatically enrolled into the monitoring system. The admins team may also add accounts manually if they have been given a strike.
- The system will monitor all posts, comments and DMs sent by new users, and bring them to the attention of the admin team if it appears suspicious. In egregious cases, it will auto-remove posts and comments if required, but a human admin will always review and reverse any false positives as soon as required.
- Once we have validated that the user is not a harasser, they will be removed from the system.
We don’t want to go into too much detail on how it all works to prevent bad actors from bypassing it, but we can say that all the processing is being done locally on the instance server.
For most of you, this wont have any impact, but some of you have been impacted by the systems false positives. It is also a good time to point out that DM messages are not private, and should not be used for anything that requires strong privacy.
There will likely be teething problems, but we are actively working on improving the bot to minimize impact and we are always open to feedback.
We don't want to do this kind of thing, we are being forced to, because bad actors keep using our server to send harassment.
If you know a better way to handle that, we are all ears
If your OP and your response to me could literally be word for word what Stephen Miller says about the need for current US immigration policy, you bet there has to be a better way.
That’s probably more than a quick back and forth but would include some questions like:
Also: you do what you want on your instance but as a new user I hope this is very clearly advertised to new users signing up, as this is very yuck and privacy invading, not to mention tone deaf for the world we live in.
Then again I’m probably not in your target audience.
There isn't anything new in regards to privacy with this move. We are just adding a tool to help flag content quicker, and we want to be transparent about out moderation. That's why we made our admin guidelines public.
From what I’m gathering is that OP possibly should not be your spokesperson, as your wording sounds far less dystopian and controlling.
I still don’t like it, but if you are disclosing it properly and you’re not offshoring the data that is monitored, that will earn you some goodwill.
It really sounds like Lemmy software is trailing behind on keeping up with the bots.
We will have a review of how we write posts and follow up in the comments later today to make sure we are clearer in our communication, and that we don't end up with 3 different admins chiming in on separate comments.
We try to always make pinned announcements when making notable changes to our operation to keep the community informed. Any changes, minor or major, that we believe our users would want to know, we will always post about here.
Lemmy is trailing behind when it comes to moderation tools just in general, which is what that is forcing us to make our own tools to help with moderation.
for a couple of those
The things that are checked are public (posts, comments, and dms that are also sent to other servers we dont control) and can be moderated on regardless of this. There isnt anything that breaches privacy
The way its being moderated isnt disclosed so that people cant just bypass it. The processing is local though like said in the original message (so for example were not sending this to some LLM/Ai to then use)