Comic Books

3430 readers

69 users here now

A place to discuss comic books of all types, from old to new, Big 2 to indie, and everything in between.

Floppies, graphic novels, compilations, omnibusses (omnibusi?) are all fair game.

There is only one rule:*

Comic Books is a no judgement zone.

You can talk all you want about how Rob Liefeld is trash, Bob Kane is an asshole, or Frank Miller and Dave Sim’s politics have made them toxic, that’s all good.

If, however, another user is LEGITIMATELY a fan of something you don’t like, that does NOT make them a lesser person. Attack the art for being bad, not the person for being a fan of bad art.

* I lied. There are TWO rules... No piracy. Cover shots? That's good. Interior pages, in moderation? Sure. Full books? Links to pirate sites? That's how we get things shut down. :(

I'm not saying it's been a problem, because it hasn't been.

See our sister sites!

Marvel Studios! For all the latest on the Marvel Cinematic Universe!

https://lemmy.world/c/marvelstudios

For other cinematic content, hit up Movies! Aquaman is coming soon, followed by the big reboot!

https://lemmy.world/c/movies

And don't forget Movies and TV over at piefed.social! A good place for discussing Marvel, DC and other film and television properties!

!television@piefed.social

Want to talk BOOK books? See Books!

https://lemmy.world/c/books

Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay? Becoming Superman? John Carter and the Gods of Hollywood? That's the place!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

jordanlund@lemmy.world

ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com

'Dark Knight III: The Master Race #3' variant cover art drawn by Jim Lee, with inks by Scott Williams (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 day ago by setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world to c/comicbooks@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] borkborkbork@piefed.social 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

a lot of people recoil at bats using a firearm.

I recoil at the thought of bats using a machinegun as shitty as the m60. bruce could afford better.

we are not the same.

[–] buttmasterflex@piefed.social 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The M60 is a reliable, well designed machine gun. From an in depth write up of the gun

It was not unusual for an M60 to be used on daily missions where the treelines around perimeters would be pounded for 5-6,000 rounds in a day before landing in an LZ. Clearly, many of these M60s would be facing terminal life at a month’s use, but they soldiered on. Quite a few of these worn out guns were donated to Central American fighters in the 1980s, and this has led to legends about how “Bad” the M60 was. The fact is, the M60 GPMG was a very reliable machine gun, and while it had its problems, it was quite popular and faithful to the machine gunner who kept it clean and properly lubed.

[–] borkborkbork@piefed.social 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I don't give a fuck what the link says. The only part on point is the last line.

The authors obviously never humped a pig, the ones we had in the late 80s/early 90s were garbage. hope you have a BIG spray bottle of clp and a lot of time to spend maintaining the plastic contraption - literally hours of maint for every few belts in the field. It was overly heavy for what it brought to bear, and the ROF didn't break any new ground. Oh and bring extra blank fire adaptors, they tend to get bendy / melty with any kind of sustained bursts.

(tho, the giant training models were kinda cool, imagine a 2x sized plastic m60 model to illustrate the operation).

https://auctions.morphyauctions.com/RARE_OVERSIZE_DVC_23_5_M60_MACHINE_GUN_CLASSROOM_T-LOT654166.aspx

[–] buttmasterflex@piefed.social 1 points 6 hours ago

I have no personal experience with any kind of machine gun, so ¯\(ツ)/¯