this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
163 points (93.6% liked)

Green Energy

4373 readers
267 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

cool cool cool, except cities have 25% of their space taken up by parking lots, and land that has solar panels like on the right are pretty much stuck being just solar.

pavement does not need to be heated by the sun. and putting up a solar field needs to include the cost of the land, where as parking lots do not

[–] morto@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If your city is 25% parking lots, you have a much deeper problem that solar panels won't solve

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think it's called North America.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, that's the name of the problem.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

The USA has corn fields specifically grown to be turned into FUEL. These crops are a waste. These fields can be used for solar instead.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

i mean yes. but this isn’t about those problems specifically. but the average american city is apparently 22% parking lot upon a quick look.

if we are going to have nearly a quarter of a city as dead land, might as well as put up solar panels and lessen our dependency on destructive forms of power generation.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel that you may not have read the whole thing. This post is in support of elevated solar panels.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

seems kinda ambiguous. because usually when someone says “it’s time to correct the record” the image they post is usually the corrected record… or at least the posters intention is elaborated at least a little

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“but they are not the same” which points to the main pictures meaning of “it’s more expensive to build parking lot solar panels then fields for solar panels. the cost being the pointed to difference.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's fair, I do agree the point should have been more prominent. I didn't realize until the end that it was supporting both which is why I suggested you may not have read all of it.

I remember seeing this image (or one like it) and the post was flooded armchair engineers talking about how bad parking lot solar is and I assumed the "fix" was adding the conclusion at the end.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

yea i was torn as to what the op’s meaning was, and just took a stab with how i saw things.