this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
28 points (96.7% liked)

Godot

7655 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to the programming.dev Godot community!

This is a place where you can discuss about anything relating to the Godot game engine. Feel free to ask questions, post tutorials, show off your godot game, etc.

Make sure to follow the Godot CoC while chatting

We have a matrix room that can be used for chatting with other members of the community here

Links

Other Communities

Rules

We have a four strike system in this community where you get warned the first time you break a rule, then given a week ban, then given a year ban, then a permanent ban. Certain actions may bypass this and go straight to permanent ban if severe enough and done with malicious intent

Wormhole

!roguelikedev@programming.dev

Credits

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

UPDATE: The consensus seems to be overwhelmingly in favour of the match variant. And not to worry, I have replaced the magic numbers with an enum. Will try to remember to merge the branch tomorrow

Does an if-statement block or a switch statement fit better here? For context (and advertisement), this is part of my all-purpose utility plugin ( Codeberg link)

The code:

		# Method 1 (Yandere Dev Technique)  
		if self.throw_errors and status==MpupTest.TESTSTATUS.ERROR:  
			push_error(result)  
		if self.throw_warnings and status==MpupTest.TESTSTATUS.WARNING:  
			push_warning(result)  
		
		# Method 2 (Pirate Software Technique)  
		match status:  
			MpupTest.TESTSTATUS.ERROR:  
				if self.throw_errors:  
					push_error(result)  
			MpupTest.TESTSTATUS.WARNING:  
				if self.throw_warnings:  
					push_warning(result)  
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would be tempted to rename "result" to something more descriptive.

[–] waldfee@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Imo result is more descriptive than even Java-esque variable names, because it tells you that this is the variable that will actually be returned, rather than just some intermediate representation

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The function name ought to describe what is being returned?

[–] waldfee@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yea, basically. Like, the users shouldn't have to look at your implementation to find that out what it will return. My example here would be Square.area(). Maybe they would have to look at the method's docs though to find out what unit the result is in