this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
22 points (92.3% liked)

Privacy

4662 readers
398 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Ategon@programming.dev
danielintempesta@programming.dev
22
Every privacy app asks you to trust them. We ask you not to. (github.com)
submitted 1 week ago by cm0002@suppo.fi to c/privacy@programming.dev
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

We build free, open-source privacy tools — encrypted chat, anonymous mail, untraceable voice, a whistleblower drop, a browser, a network layer. All given away.

But "free and open source" means nothing if you can't check it. So:

  • Source is public — read every line: github.com/Anon-Gratis
  • Hashes are signed — verify the binary matches what we published
  • Build it yourself — don't want our binary? Compile it from source

We don't want your trust. We want you to not need it. The only privacy tool that survives "trust me bro" is the one you can read.

🌐 anonymous.gratis · ✉️ admin@anon.gratis (PGP on site)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Exposure.

What do you prefer? Or… are you not a developer and you just want to complain?

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Exposure

Then where’s their radicle instance?

are you not a developer and you just want to complain?

protip: for someone to subscribe themselves to this /c/, you HAVE TO pressume subscribers have modicum scripting and setup knowledge. Otherwise you read antisocial for not scoping who would 1) know what lemmy is, 2) subscribe to/c/privacy/, 3) respond in dissatisfaction to centralizing mirrors in fascist servers.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ASPD.

So, what’s your preferred solution?

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok, now you demonstrating poor reading comprehension. Reread my first answer.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don’t specify the public git provider you would prefer people use. This is probably because you don’t know what git is.

[–] ItJustDonn@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

out of curiosity, how viable is it for a dev/team to mirror a repository between github and forgejo (for example)?

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 3 points 1 week ago

Quite viable for Git data. Less viable for collaboration state.