this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
230 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

85208 readers
3941 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
230
Brave is charging $60 for a version of its browser that removes the features you probably never wanted (www.techspot.com)
submitted 1 day ago by const_void@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The idea behind ladybird is great. I just just wish someone else was at the helm. Kling seems to be kind of a huge douche.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I really don't care about that. There's another part to this story and people just want to hate.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Care to elaborate? I personally wouldn't "cancel" Ladybird as a project, but I do think it's worth pointing out when shitty prople do shitty things.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They didn't do a shitty thing. Somebody raised a PR for a useless change regarding a developer document.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You clearly did not read what I linked. There's more than that to this situation.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yes I did. Twice now to make sure I didn't read over something. But I also read the original GitHub PR while it was still open. And what you linked is just an opinion on the situation.

I'm on the side of the maintainer. Always have been, always will. You want to be politically correct? Go into politics. Or at least wait until they start translating and branding. There's no need to go and change something that meaningless. It shows you actively went and searched for it, instead of actually helping out the project or staying out of their way.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

You missed the "followup" section then, twice.

Since it's so difficult, let me help you out: article 1, article 2.

I'm starting to think that the quote at the end of the article I originally shared applies to you too.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

God you're obnoxious.