this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
193 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

85208 readers
3953 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Brave is a scam and not security or privacy

[–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago

Free on Linux. But you should just use Firefox or its forks.

[–] WereCat@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

It’s free on Linux. Still, I find it difficult to justify paying for a browser unless you want to directly support it.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 hours ago

The fact that they have to charge $60 to not have all that crap in there should tell you everything about why they have that crap in there. Taking it out kills their revenue stream from their “free” fully-featured version.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Unless you absolutely want to contribute to the chromium monopoly, Firefox is right there and still free. If you're concerned about the telemetry, LibreWolf is worth looking at.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Firefox has implemented many of the same features that Chrome has recently (groups, split tabs, vertical tabs, reading mode etc.) but has also consistently been implementing them earlier and better. There are just so many small annoyances with these features on Chrome that aren't there in Firefox, and Chrome is always late to the party.

The golden era of Chrome is long gone, probably because the most competent people working at Google have moved on.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

This is just my opinion but, no one using chrome should complain about telemetry in FF.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Mandatory note: you cannot contribute a dime towards Firefox. Google contributes, not you. Money given to Mozilla will find its way into AI experiments (https://www.mozilla.ai/) and AI grants (https://mozilla.vc/).

Clarification: You can disable all the AI stuff with one switch.

Furthermore, the hardened forks of Firefox don't have it.

Still better than contributing to the chromium monopoly.

[–] KraeuterRoy@feddit.org 31 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Gonna call it now: that 60 quid 'one time' purchase is not gonna be the end of it.

In, at most, a couple of years, one of these things will happen:

  • the model will be switched to a monthly subscription
  • features will be cut and sold separately
  • 'limited, non-targeted' ads 'from trusted partners' will be introduced
  • the thing will be buried completely because it's not financially viable
[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 hours ago

That's what one gets for installing US-tech. They invented enshittification and here we go.

Knew I was right to never even check brave out.

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Don't forget the "major" version increment that breaks "lifetime".

  • Oh, you're mistaken. The license is for the lifetime of version 32. To use version 33 you must upgrade. But no rush, you have until version 33.1 before we activate the kill switch.
[–] T156@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Or they rebrand it, and pull the "lifetime is only to the end of the product lifetime" trick.

[–] DeathbringerThoctar@lemmy.world 60 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Oh shit. Someone finally called my "I'd pay not to have to use AI" bluff.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 43 points 19 hours ago

Brave, and Brandon Eck are shit anyway, with or without AI.

[–] KatherinaReichelt@feddit.org 45 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks, but I'll just stick to Firefox

[–] gankouskhan@piefed.zip 12 points 15 hours ago

Firefox+Betterfox is whatever brave is trying to do here, but free and open. Fuck brave and their scummy practices. Module isn't perfect, but in comparison is clear.

[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 4 points 12 hours ago

That's what you get for using a broader called brave. We all knew we'd end up here.

[–] razen@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago

They are endorsing linux, what a good company asking users to indirectly move to linux for their browser.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 23 points 19 hours ago

Huh, funnily enough, Ive introduced my own $60 fee if they want me to read the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy agreements that come along with their browser.

[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago

Good news for me! I don't have to pay since I don't use brave at all. Yay me!

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 10 points 18 hours ago

Brave is something I never wanted in the first place.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The idea behind ladybird is great. I just just wish someone else was at the helm. Kling seems to be kind of a huge douche.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I really don't care about that. There's another part to this story and people just want to hate.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Care to elaborate? I personally wouldn't "cancel" Ladybird as a project, but I do think it's worth pointing out when shitty prople do shitty things.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

They didn't do a shitty thing. Somebody raised a PR for a useless change regarding a developer document.

[–] mracton@piefed.social 3 points 18 hours ago

You can go into the settings and manually disable (nearly?) all the features that are removed in the paid version without paying anything. That’s what I did. They aren’t paywalling the ability disable the features.

It doesn’t matter to me whether someone uses Brave or not, but the headline is misleading, though pedantically accurate.