this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
131 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

43062 readers
293 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fifrok@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes, the hydrological cycle is global, of course none of the water just disappears. What you're missing is that the usage is local, data servers use mains water most of the time.

Mains water must come from somewhere, the local area has limited processing capabilities, and heavy industrial consumption severely depletes local groundwater reserves faster than natural rainfall can ever replenish them, forcing nearby communities to bear both the ecological and financial costs of a utility network that was almost never designed to handle such strain.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

i mean, a regulation could be made up that requires data center operators to bring their own supplies, i.e. make up additional plumbing for the village. and pipe the water from somewhere where it's plentiful. a big river or sth.

[–] dan@upvote.au 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org 4 points 1 day ago

Of course! Thanks for asking for clarification.