this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
181 points (99.5% liked)

Privacy

4634 readers
771 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XLE@piefed.social -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm confused about what you believe right now. Do you think Vincent is a liar like you said first? Or do you think he made a little oopsie like you said second?

Both cannot be true at the same time.

I think it's weird that you think Proton should just accept defamation from a political extremist, but I guess we just have different moral standards.

But if you were being truthful when you say that you would change your mind if you saw a pattern, here you go.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't give a fuck what Vincent said. You're latching onto something that is completely pointless and I'm not going to engage you on.

Assuming your link is about the shit Andy Yen said before, then I agree it is problematic, but I don't think there is a through line to proton sponsoring Vincent. I'd bet it's completely unrelated.

[–] XLE@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't give a fuck what Vincent said

Strange of you to say that, because if you don't care, you wouldn't have made two separate statements about it.

Assuming your link is...

Feyd, why are you changing your narrative by simply the possibility of seeing something?

Edit: Let's see if you have the same dishonesty problems as Vincent does. https://vger.to/lemmy.ml/comment/26101269

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So there is a pattern. I agree that makes it much worse. You could have just said that instead of literally every other comment you wasted my time with.

[–] XLE@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Neat. Since we're apparently on the same side, you can feel free to amend your blind defense of Proton, rather than keeping them up and wasting people's time

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You linked the article about archive.today? Are you high? I think I'll just block you because you're insufferable

[–] XLE@piefed.social -1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Because it's you spamming worthless noise, a strange ad-hom, designed to waste people's time. Something you alleged to care about.