this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
325 points (97.1% liked)

Privacy

49221 readers
524 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Moving the goalposts. You said they need to drop the fascist from their sponsorship and they did. They also committed to not doing it in the future. They did exactly what you said.

On top of that, companies are not your friends and they don’t need political positions. Not supporting fascists is perfectly adequate.

[–] redrumBot@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

No, I didnt't say that. I've said:

No, there is not an antifascist position on their statement. Only a ultracentrist position based on the reaction of their user base/market.

See the original paragraph:

I understand that they would have removed also the sponsorship of a feminist, vegan or antiracist that created discontent in their use base (by being feminist, vegan or antiracist).

[–] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

Exactly. I'm a but grumpy about that response because their just saying that if his opinion would be more main stream, they wouldn't back down on the sponsorship.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 week ago

I think you're extremely confused as to what Proton is and the service they offer.

I also think it's because you're falling (or have fallen) into the tribalist view of "if you're not with us, you're against us, and if you're against them, you're with us".

Proton is a-political, pro-agenda. Their agenda is "net neutrality, privacy, security". They don't care who makes that happen, and will support anyone who fights for these things.

They won't take an antifascist position because that would put them on the political spectrum.

I also understand that - to you - not making that statement already puts them on the political spectrum, in the opposing camp, but that's, again, due to the tribalist views.

They've praised left-wingers and right-wingers, they've criticised Democrats and Republicans - as long as anyone pushes for their agenda, they will praise them, as long as someone threatens their agenda, they will criticise them. That's all there is to it.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They have also said that if the user base finds their sponsorship or seeming alignment with any other divisive agenda, they welcome feedback.

I'm not following their PR engagement, but if anyone feels strongly about them aligning with furbys, they are welcome to feedback.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that's PR talk for "we didn't mind until you did"

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure. That's more than many other companies do.

Proton or any other company doesn't owe anyone anything more than what they're paid for. Everything else is CSR if you like.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"many companies are doing it" is not an excuse. if they are taking my money and giving it to nazis for the spread of society-destabilizing propaganda, that's very much something they owe an explanation to society for.

and might not be something an upstanding person would want to keep paying for either.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I applaud you for holding all the companies you engage with to the highest of your ethical standards.

I'll be here content with the middle ground.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

there is no "middle ground". we are literally talking about fascism.

what else would one be trying to hide from with all that encryption?

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't see myself as 'hiding' from facism. We need to stamp it out.

Now I'm not even sure what we're arguing about.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

we don't stamp stuff out by financing it.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well then, the answer is clear - vote with your wallet.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

no such thing as voting fascism out.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not following your train of thought. What is the appropriate response? How do we remove facism?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

collectively deciding not to tolerate it at all is step 0. we seem to be missing it so far.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's be specific - in what way should the intolerance of fascists manifest?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

maybe not lining up to justify, normalize and even pay for it.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The goalposts when it comes to fascists has been the same since the 1940s. Nobody moved shit.