this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
1427 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

85297 readers
5643 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
1427
Landmark German ruling declares Google's AI Overviews are Google's own words and makes it liable for false answers (the-decoder.com)
submitted 1 day ago by fusspilz@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
97 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

Yup, that's the precedent bit I mentioned. They're both valid ways of deciding ambiguity (a judge decides in this situation and other judges aren't obligated to decide the same way, or lawyers debate the ambiguity, a jury decides, and courts strive for consistency), but they're fundamentally different and slightly bewildering to people from the other model.

Purely an answer to the question "I mean, how different could they really be?โ€: fundamentally different in an almost unrecognizable way.