this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
317 points (99.1% liked)

PurchaseWithPurpose

1000 readers
28 users here now

A community driven to showing our voice through the things we buy and use.

A few useful links:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Including a concern that Google's Pentagon deal could mean mass surveillance of EU citizens.

Google's own staff don't trust them anymore... we shouldn't either.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It’s not that he’s blind, it’s that he has a different moral compass compared to us. That’s why he became a director, because he has a flawed moral compass and is driven mainly by money.

Apparently his moral compass does have its limits, or he decided he made all the money he will ever need and is trying to clear his conscience and his reputation.

I believe that's a key distinction. Google's behavior has become too problematic for someone who is significantly morally deficient.

Big fucking red flag here.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That’s why he became a director, because he has a flawed moral compass

Whoa, whoa, hold up. What would "trying to change the system from within" look like? Maybe he had better motives but has now given up.

Jumping to conclusions to fit a common narrative is not how we'd like to be, is it? Are we irrevocably jaded beyond redemption, or can we assume better of people until we know more?

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He kept working there through a whole plethora of morally bankrupt decisions. He has proven his guilt many times over. So, what jumping to conclusions exactly?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

"Guys, maybe the Nazis in the SS were trying to change the system from within? We shouldn't jump to conclusions!"

Sure, it's technically possible they were trying to change things from within. Seeing as they didn't speak up before and continued to work there, as a director, for a long time without any public protest, indicates to me they're culpable in whatever Google was doing. If they want to prove that wrong, they're free to provide evidence, or to take actions that prove it (like leak some damning data or something). We don't always have to wait for evidence to prove something like this though.