this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2026
36 points (100.0% liked)
technology
24389 readers
132 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wym index funds are required to buy the largest companies? What law is this?
Not a law, that's just how index funds work. It's meant to be an un-managed investment fund that tracks some aspect of the market via predefined rules. The S&P500 for instance tracks the top 500 companies by market capitalization (among a bunch of other weird rules), and it does so by purchasing shares in these companies proportionately. So new company appears that meets the criteria -> purchase. The big part of the story here is the fact that all of these index funds changed their rules to include spacex, especially when spacex's finances look terrible.
I highly doubt that this is true. Do you have a reputable source for this?
wall street journal
FTSE Russell Latest to Make U.S. Index Inclusion Easier ahead of SpaceX IPO | May 27, 2026 (archive.ph)
fortune
You can ignore AI giants like SpaceX, but your 401(k) won’t | June 13, 2026 (archive.ph)
u.s. senate committe on banking
Warren Presses Index Providers on Rule Changes to Rush SpaceX Shares Into Americans' Retirement Accounts | June 11, 2026 (senate.gov)
nyc comptroller
Letter to the London Stock Exchange Group and FTSE Russell Re: SpaceX | June 11, 2026 (nyc.gov)
It says index inclusion not ETF inclusion. So, if you buy an ETF of the S&P 500 you‘re good since there SpaceX is not listed.
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/12/spacex-ipo-sp-500-index-funds-investors.html
s&p is one of the few that didn't change their rules. if you buy an etf of a different index, they are legally required to purchase the same equities in the index, or that would be fraud.
from the article you linked: