this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
2 points (57.1% liked)

AskHistorians

1369 readers
19 users here now

QUESTIONS

  1. Be civil.
  2. Be specific.
  3. Historical topic must be from at least 20 years ago.
  4. Post questions in the title. Elaboration is for the text box.

RESPONSES

  1. Be civil.
  2. Provide comprehensive answers.
  3. Please provide primary and secondary sources upon good faith request. Tertiary sources, like Wikipedia, are not accepted.

askhistorians is a community for academic answers to questions about history. Polls, opinions, bigotry, grammar pedantry, and personal insults will be removed.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My follow up post was going to be about men. But you guys beat me to it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think there's a core difference, which is intent, sexy v sexualised

Men are often sexy, but rarely sexualised

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Superman's underwear is on the outside and his suit is nearly always painted on.

BatNipples.

Thor's entire marvel design history is essentially 'boring office worker turns into half naked muscle bound man,' which brings me to He-man which is the same thing and also skeletor for some reason has more muscles than mister olympia and just has this tiny little loin cloth on top of his robes for no reason except to tease the reader.

Hell the x-men. I actually forgot until I looked up some references but they're the origin of the whole 'painted on uniform' trend to a large extent. No one can look at wolverine's design and say that isn't ridiculously sexualized.

There is a difference, of course, that being comic book artists were primarily selling to plausibly straight teenage boys so there are more women and thus more sexualized women; but at least a few comic heroes were clearly targeting the gay demographic and hypersexualizing men.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Sexy sure, but sexualised is the "sexy lamp" problem, where if you swapped the character for a sexy lamp, you wouldn't notice.

There's also the needless poses that no person would use, like casually in a standing split with arched back

Male characters have much much much much much much much much much much much less examples of that than female characters

https://www.tumblr.com/thehawkeyeinitiative