this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
52 points (91.9% liked)

chat

8624 readers
218 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

i was under the impression that were explicitly against genAI but i found that some people are actually VERY pro genai and quite dismissive of its risks. this happened on lemmy but i saw people getting downvoted for saying that genAI in its current state is harmful to the environment. i saw the old bullshit of how ”i use AI for art because i cant draw”, it was crazy. i called someone a Promptitute and someone unironically told me not to say that, just so much. so can everybody pls affirm you dont support that crap.

another user straight up admitted that they use AI as a friend and to gn to... i dont care how much we have in common ideologically, i cant support you gning to chatgpt and thinking its your friend...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 11 points 6 days ago (3 children)

If this was contained to scientific work like helping doctors identify cancer cells

lol yeah let's have the useless lying machine take care of highly sensitive and detailed medical work

Pick a lane, ideologue

Blocking you because we don't have a disable inbox replies and in dont want to argue with nerds all day

[–] immuredanchorite@hexbear.net 31 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There is a difference in application you aren’t acknowledging… training a neural network type computer algorithm to detect cancer on a computed tomography scan is different than a black box that tells you to drink antifreeze - the former isn’t even an LLM… honestly the terminology is so poisoned by the AI bubble marketing, I didn’t even know if you were talking about generative AI or general artificial intelligence at first… not really even sure generative is anything but marketing a specific set of algorithms in a way that implies a level of humanity so that companies can try to sell it as replacing human workers

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

a black box that tells you to drink antifreeze

Do i need to acknowledge anything at all whatsoever when I'm arguing with people who think it still does this?

It's valid to suggest someone pick a lane when they're saying it's so useless it can't give you a recipe but still somehow potentially useful enough to somehow be used for medical purposes. Guess what, I'm a chef and i literally have not once in the last year at least googled a food item or recipe and it not given something correct (even if it might be a list of steps I wouldn't do) and it also frequently exposes me to new culinary things like haitian pikliz when I was looking up haitian black bean shit. That is legitimately useful

Nobody needs to tell me the cost of data centers isn't worth the suggestion of "what if you made haitian pickles" but the point is that if the argument is "it's mechanically useless in its current state" you're just wrong

[–] Inui@hexbear.net 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Gemini told a guy to kill himself last August, less than a year ago. They may do it less and it may be less explicit than "here's how you can make your microwave explode", but they have absolutely not stopped being bullshit machines when pushed in certain scenarios. I'm not a anti-AI maximalist either, though do have a general disdain, but what you are saying is not true.

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

neural networks have a use case that they genuinely excel at and that's picking up on subtle patterns in immense datasets, and reinforcing those patterns until they become visible to humans. that's basically what neural networks fundamentally are is self-reinforcing pattern-finding programs. biology and chemistry in particular have the kind of near-infinite variables and chaotic systems that really benefit from having a machine that can draw out these patterns for humans to follow up on

advocates for these uses aren't saying the computer should be allowed to directly diagnose people or anything like that, that kind of stupid hubris is a recent thing from the genai people

[–] supdawg813@hexbear.net 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

They specifically said "as applied to chatbots" so it seems to me like theyre talking about the broader field of machine learning as a whole, which is great as smaller models used in specialized applications and isn't limited to LLMs, i.e. their mention of cancer research, vs literally anything that has ever been posted on the internet and can be spoken of using human language being used to amalgamate bullshit for any user that seeks it.